GEMİ SİSTEMLERİ İÇİN ENTEGRE BAKIM-ONARIM YÖNETİMİ GEREKSİNİMİNİN ANALİZİ

  • Selçuk Çebi
  • Metin Çelik
  • Cengiz Kahraman
Keywords: Integrated Maintenance Management, Shipboard Systems, Fuzzy Set Theory, Axiomatic Design, Information Axiom

Abstract

Effectiveness of maintenance management is directly related to critical parameters of technical systems such as
efficiency, reliability, and economic life. In practice, this process is executed via procedures on selected
adequate maintenance method among which the alternatives such as Total Productive Maintenance, Planned
Maintenance, Preventive Maintenance, Predictive Maintenance, Reactive Maintenance, or Reliability Centered
Maintenance. However, increasing system complexity due to the contributions of technological developments
requires implementing more advance maintenance planning techniques. In this study, an integrated maintenance
management system is presented based on Fuzzy Information Axioms methodology for shipboard systems under
various characteristics and functional attributes. An extended and more effective maintenance management
systematic is developed for merchant ships using applied decision model outcomes.

References

[1] Piotrowski, J. April 2, 2001. Pro-Active
Maintenance for Pumps, Archives, February 2001,
Pump-Zone.com [Report online].
http://www1.eere.energy.gov/femp/pdfs/OM_5.pdf
[2] Saptarshi S. ve Ramanjaneyulu K.
(basımda).Condition evaluation of existing reinforced
concrete bridges using fuzzy based analytic hierarchy
approach. Expert Systems with Applications.
[3] Al-Najjar, B., Alsyouf, I., Selecting the most
efficient maintenance approach using fuzzy multiple
criteria decision making International Journal of
Production Economics, 84(1, 85-100), 2003.
[4] Sanchez, A., Carlos, S., Martorell,S. ve
Villanueva, J.F., Addressing imperfect maintenance
modelling uncertainty in unavailability and cost based
optimization, Reliability Engineering & System
Safety, In Press, Corrected Proof, Available online 24
March 2007.
[5] Bevilacqua M., Braglia B., The Analytic
Hierarchy Process Applied to Maintenance Strategy
Selection, Reliability Engineering and System Safety,
70(2) 71-83, 2000.
[6] Davidson, G.G., Labib, A.W., Learning from
Failures: Design Improvements Using a Multiple
Criteria Decision Making Process, Journal of
Aerospace Engineering, 217(G), 207-216, 2003.
[7] Triantaphyllou, E., Kovalerchuk, B., Mann, L.,
Knapp, G., M., Determining The Most Important
Criteria in Maintenance Decision Making, Journal of
Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 3(1), 16-28,
1997.
[8] Mete, M., ve Manisalı, M., Bakım
Stratejilerinin Seçiminde Bulanık Çok Amaçlı Karar
Verme Modeli, YA/EM-Yöneylem
Araştırması/Endüstri Mühendisliği 27. Ulusal
Kongresi, 2-4 Temmuz 2007, İzmir.
[9] Zadeh, L.A., 1965. Fuzzy sets. Information and
Control 8, 338–353.
[10] Buckley, J.J., 1985. Fuzzy hierarchical
analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 17, 233–247
[11] Saaty, T.L., 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy
Process. McGraw-Hill Inc.
[12] Chen, S.J. & Hwang, C.L., Fuzzy Multi
Attribute Decision Making: Methods and
Applications. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1992.
[13] Hsieh, T.Y., Lu, S.T., & Tzeng, G.T. Fuzzy
MCDM approach for planning and design tenders
selection in public office buildings. International
Journal of Project Management, 22, 573–584, 2004.
[14] Suh, N.P., The Principles Of Design. Oxford
University Press, New York, 1990.
[15] Suh, N.P., Axiomatic Design: Advances and
Applications. Oxford University Press, New York,
2001.
[16] Kulak, O. & Kahraman, C., “Multi-attribute
comparison of advanced manufacturing systems using
fuzzy vs. crisp axiomatic design approach”.
International Journal of Production Economics, 95,
415-424, 2005.
[17] Çebi, S. ve Çelik, M., Denizcilik İşletmeleri
Yönetimi MBA Programı Yapılandırılması İçin
Bulanık Aksiyomatik Tasarım Yönetimi Tabanlı Karar
Destek Sistemi Önerisi, 2.Ulusal Sistem Mühendisliği
Kongresi, 6-8 Şubat 2008, İstanbul.
[18] Kulak, O. ve Kahraman, C., “Fuzzy multiattribute
selection among transportation companies
using axiomatic design and analytic hierarchy
process”, Information Sciences, 170, 191-210, 2005.
[19] Kulak, O., “A decision support system for
fuzzy multi-attribute selection of material handling
equipments”, Expert Systems with Applications, 29(
2),310-319, 2005.
[20] Kulak, O., Durmuşoğlu, M.B., ve Kahraman,
C., “Fuzzy multi-attribute equipment selection based
on information axiom”, Journal of Materials
Processing Technology, 169, 337-345, 2005.
[21] Celik, M., Kahraman, C., Cebi, S.,ve Er, I. D.,
(Basımda). “Fuzzy Axiomatic Design-Based
Performance Evaluation Model for Docking Facilities
in Shipbuilding Industry: The Case of Turkish
Shipyards”, Expert Systems with Applications,
[22] Çebi, S., ve Çelik, M., Denizcilik İşletmeleri
Yönetimi Tezsiz Yüksek Lisans Programı
Yapılandırılması İçin Bulanık Aksiyomlarla Tasarım
Yöntemi Tabanlı Karar Destek Sistemi Önerisi,
Sistem Mühendisliği Sempozyumu, Yıldız Teknik
Üniversitesi, Mayıs 2008, İstanbul
Published
2008-07-21
How to Cite
[1]
S. Çebi, M. Çelik, and C. Kahraman, “GEMİ SİSTEMLERİ İÇİN ENTEGRE BAKIM-ONARIM YÖNETİMİ GEREKSİNİMİNİN ANALİZİ”, JAST, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 17-24, Jul. 2008.
Section
Articles