PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF BOX-COX TRANSFORMATION AND WEIGHTED VARIANCE METHODS WITH WEIBULL DISTRIBUTION

  • Bahar Sennaroğlu
  • Özlem Şenvar
Keywords: Process Capability Index, Box-Cox Transformation Method, Weighted Variance Method

Abstract

A standard process capability index is calculated based on the assumption that the quality characteristic of the process follows the normal distribution. But there are many cases in which the quality characteristic comes from a non-normal distribution. This paper studies Box-Cox transformation method and Weighted Variance method to calculate process capability indices for Weibull distributed quality characteristic and compares performances of these methods. Weibull distribution is extensively used as a lifetime distribution model because of its flexible shape. The data sets used in performance comparison are randomly generated from Weibull distribution for two different shape and scale parameters through a simulation study. The results indicate that Box-Cox transformation method produces better estimates for process capability than Weighted Variance method.

References

[1] Pearn, W.L., Chen, K.S., “One-sided capability indices Cpu and Cpl: decision making with sample information”, International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 19(3), 221-245,2002.
[2] Kolarik, W.J., “Creating Quality: Concepts, Systems, Strategies, and Tools”, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1995.
[3] Montgomery, D.C.,“Statistical Quality Control: A Modern Introduction”, 6th ed., Wiley, New York,2009.
[4] Pearn, W.L., Kotz, S., “Encyclopedia and Handbook of Process Capability Indices: A Comprehensive Exposition of Quality Control Measures”, World Scientific Publishing Company, Singapore,2006.
[5] Tang, L.C., Than, S.E., Ang, B.W., “Computing Process Capability Indices for Non-normal Data: A Review and Comparative Study”, in Six Sigma: Advanced Tools for Black Belts and Master Black Belts (Eds. L.C. Tang, T.N. Goh, H.S. Yam, T. Yoap), John Wiley & Sons, 107-130,2006.
[6] Box, G.E.P., Cox, D.R., “An analysis of transformations”,Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 26, 211-252,1964.
[7] Choobineh, F., Ballard, J.L.,“Control-Limits of QC Charts for Skewed Distributions Using Weighted-Variance”, IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 36(4), 473-477, 1987.
[8] Bai, D.S., Choi, I.S., “ and R Control charts for skewed populations”, Journal of Quality Technology, 27, 120–131, 1995.
[9] Wu, H.-H., Swain, J.J., Farrington, P.A., Messimer S.L., “A weighted variance capability index for general non-normal processes”, Quality and Reliability Engineering International,15(5), 397-402, 1999.
Published
2015-07-27
How to Cite
[1]
B. Sennaroğlu and Özlem Şenvar, “PERFORMANCE COMPARISON OF BOX-COX TRANSFORMATION AND WEIGHTED VARIANCE METHODS WITH WEIBULL DISTRIBUTION”, JAST, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 49-55, Jul. 2015.
Section
Articles